Legal Opinion

Nickels v. Nickels

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 1991No. 17357PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge.

The first appeal in this case appears in Nickels v. Cohn, 764 S.W.2d 124 (Mo.App. 1989). We held that the trial court properly determined, among other issues, that plaintiffs had the right to specific performance of a preemptive covenant in a quit claim deed between the parents of plaintiffs. The preemptive covenant resulted from the parents’ property settlement agreement in their dissolution of marriage action.

In the first appeal we affirmed a determination of the trial court that its judgment on two counts of plaintiffs’ petition was a final judgment for purposes of appeal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Standard Oil Company of California v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  3. Liberty Financial Management Corp. v. Beneficial Data Processing Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Rossomanno v. Laclede Cab CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  5. Starkovich v. NoyeArizona Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. C & W ASSET ACQUISITION, LLC v. SomogyiMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Markley v. EdmistonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Discover Bank v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API