Legal Opinion

Rodriquez v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided November 20, 1991No. 10-90-119-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS, Chief Justice.

Appellant was convicted of murder. His primary contentions on appeal concern article 46.02 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which relates to a defendant’s competency to stand trial. See Tex.Code Crim. PROC.Ann. art. 46.02 (Vernon 1979 and Vernon Supp.1991). Other points question the admission of extraneous-offense evidence and the court’s jurisdiction. The judgment will be affirmed.

Prior to trial, both Appellant and the State filed motions requesting psychiatric or psychological examination of Appellant for the purpose of determining his competency to stand…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mulder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Sisco v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Gardner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ryan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1996
  2. Gilbert v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1993
  3. Means v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1998
  4. Alcott v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
  5. Cutrer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API