Brevard v. Summar
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM CANNON. Appeal from the Chancery Court at 'Woodbury, B. M. Tillman, Ch., presiding. Summar, cited Sto. Eq. Jur., §§ 1018, 1020, 1227, and note 2; 3 Sim., 499. Mylne & IV, 296, 310; 3 Yo. & Col., 55, 61; 2 Meigs’ Dig., 924.
1Opinion of the CourtFreeman, J.
This record presents the following state of facts: Geo. W. Bogle .and W. It. Bogle, on March 13, 1861, sold a tract of land of about seventy acres, to one F. A. Womack, at the price of $1,500. They took from him a penal bond in the sum of three thousand dollars, of that date, with one A. S. McKnight as security on the same, binding said Womack to assume and pay for the said G. W. and W. It. Bogle, the following debts: $750, due from them to John H. Smith, due 25th December, 1860; one debt to T. B. Brevard for $150, endorsed by A. S. McKnight and J. P. McKnight; one judgment in favor of *99T. B.…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Toledo, St. L. & K. C. R. v. Continental Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
- National Nut Co. of California v. Susu Nut Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1945
- Bouldin v. TaylorTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
- Knight Bros. v. Ogden Bros.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1877