Legal Opinion

Gulf, M. & O. R. v. Luter Motor Express

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1941No. 34328PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.

Mrs. L. M. Luter, doing business as Luter Motor Express, applied to the Mississippi Public Service Commission for a certificate of public convenience and necessity to operate as a common carrier, by vehicle, of commodities generally over regular routes and between fixed termini, there being two of these routes, which together extend over more than 1,000 miles and touch more than 100 towns and villages. The application was based solely upon the proviso in Section 8(a), Chap. 142, Laws 1938, which is generally referred to as the ‘ ‘ grandfather clause. ’ ’

The Commission granted the certificate…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McDonald v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. MaherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Dixie Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Mississippi Public Service CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Loving v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Crawford v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bridges v. City of BiloxiMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Gulf Mobile & O. R. R. v. Luter Motor ExpressMississippi Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API