Legal Opinion

Great Northern Railway Co. v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1935No. 25107. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

Pursuant to authority vested in it by Rem. Rev. Stat., § 9216 [P. C. § 7546], the city council of the city of Seattle passed an ordinance

“ . . . providing for the laying off, opening, extending and establishing of Second avenue from Yesler way to Fourth avenue south; . . . providing for the condemnation, appropriation, taking and damaging of land and other property necessary therefor.”

A condemnation suit was thereafter instituted in accordance with the provisions of Rem. Rev. Stat., §9217 [P. C. §7547]. In this petition, two pieces of property belonging to the Great Northern Railway Company…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Seattle v. Columbia & Puget Sound RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Hinckley v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. City of Spokane v. ColbyWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Carpenter-McNeil Investment Co. v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Provine v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Decker v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Smithrock Quarry, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. In Re Petition of City of AnacortesWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Washington Natural Gas Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. United States v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API