Legal Opinion

Brink v. Brink

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 30, 1956No. Civ. 16777PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Fred B.), J.

The sole question is whether or not by applying for and obtaining a final decree of divorce plaintiff revived his obligation to pay defendant $1,800 (a part of their property settlement agreement which had been incorporated into the interlocutory decree of divorce), an obligation which defendant concedes was discharged by an order of the bankruptcy court made after the interlocutory and before the final divorce decree.

Holding that the obligation was not revived, reaffirmed or reacknowledged, the trial court ordered quashed a writ of execution which had been issued to enforce…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Leupe v. LeupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. McCormick v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Dupont v. DupontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Wilson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Chabot v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grant v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Carlton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Forman v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Fowers v. GurneyUtah Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API