Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Under Seal

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 7, 1986No. 85-1121Published

1DissentButzner, Senior Circuit Judge

Although United States v. Sells, 463 U.S. 418, 103 S.Ct. 3133, 77 L.Ed.2d 743 *454(1983), and United States v. Baggot, 463 U.S. 476, 103 S.Ct. 3164, 77 L.Ed.2d 785 (1983), do not retroactively invalidate a pri- or disclosure order entered pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), the government is not entitled to continued access to the grand jury materials after the Supreme Court’s decisions in Sells and Baggot without showing a particularized need for the material. See Thorpe v. Housing Authority, 393 U.S. 268, 281, 89 S.Ct. 518, 525, 21 L.Ed.2d 474 (1968) (an appellate court must apply the law in effect…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. BaggotSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. In Re Grand Jury Investigation No. 78-184. Sells, Inc., Peter A. Sells, Fred R. Witte v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. In Re Grand Jury Investigation. John Does I, Ii, Iii, Iv, v and John Does, Inc. I, Ii, and III v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API