Legal Opinion

Volland v. McGee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1941PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

After judgment of dismissal had been ordered by the circuit court a motion by appellant to set aside the judgment and for a new trial was granted below. That order was not effective as the trial court could not set aside the verdict arid grant a new trial after sixty days had elapsed from the rendering of the verdict, no extension of time for cause having been granted. This is a fixed rule provided by sec. 270.49 (1), Stats. On appeal from that order the matter was considered by this court in Volland v. McGee, 236 Wis. 358, 294 N. W. 497, 295 N. W. 635, and another question of practice was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McGill v. BaumgartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Volland v. McGeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Volland v. McGeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Floeck v. HooverNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Utility Trailer Works v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  3. Dungey v. Fairview Farms, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Bowling Green-Hopkinsville Bus Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
  5. Gordon v. CozartDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API