Hohensee v. Watson
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLMER, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in this action1 are Mildred Hohensee, Richard Roe No. 1 and Richard Roe No. 2. The defendants are listed as follows: Albert L. Watson; American Medical Association, its officers and members, John Doe No. 1 through No. 4; J. Julius Levy; Stephen Teller; George Clark, and John Doe No. 1 through No. 3.
The complaint alleges that the action is brought under 15 U.S.C.A. § 15 2 and in it the plaintiffs seek treble damages in the sum of Ten Million Dollars. The complaint further alleges “The grounds upon which the jurisdiction of this Court depends is that this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Howard v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. HohenseeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- United States v. El Rancho Adolphus Products, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- A. B. v. C. D.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carone v. WhalenDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Ex parte TylerDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1975
- Hohensee v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Lynn D. Becker v. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation; The Uintah and Ouray Tribal Business Committee; Ute Energy Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2026
- No. 13116Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960