Legal Opinion
Suskin v. Nixon
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 1, 1969No. 69 C 1561PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER QUASHING SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT SUA SPONTE
ROBSON, District Judge.
The United States Attorney has filed an amicus curiae memorandum suggest ing that the summons issued against the President of the United States be quashed. For the reasons set forth below, this court is of the opinion that the service of process should be quashed and the complaint should be dismissed sua sponte.
The plaintiffs seek a judgment by a three-judge court declaring certain provisions of the draft laws unconstitutional on the ground these provisions discriminate in favor of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Mississippi v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Neild v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Richard M. Nixon, Individually and as President of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Martin-Trigona v. LavienDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1983
- Atlee v. LairdDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Voege v. AckermanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975