Legal Opinion
Travelers' Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Nax
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 2, 1905No. 1PublishedCited by 35 opinions
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, Circuit Judge.
This case comes before us on a writ of error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The action below was in assumpsit, to recover the amount of an accident insurance policy. By the terms of this policy, the company undertook to insure Leonard Nax
“In the sum of $25 per week, against loss of time not exceeding 52 consecutive weeks, resulting from bodily injuries effected during the term of this insurance, through external, violent and accidental means, which shall, independently of all other causes, immediately and wholly disable…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Western Commercial Travelers' Ass'n v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- Gould v. Dwelling-House Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
- Cook v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
3Cited by35 opinions
- Kolachny v. GalbreathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Shubert v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Hoffman v. Employer's Liability Assurance Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Travelers' Ins. Co. of Hartford v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Maloney v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.