Legal Opinion

Tudor v. Firebaugh

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 14, 1940No. Gen. No. 40,644PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Denis E. Sullivan

delivered the opinion of the court.

On August 20, 1934, E. Bay Grant, claiming to be the successor trustee to Bussell Firebaugh, filed his suit for an accounting against Bussell Firebaugh, alleging in said complaint that on November 4, 1931, a decree of foreclosure was entered on trust deed recorded as document No. 10,102,408, and that at the sale Bussell Firebaugh, as trustee under the terms of said trust deed, bid in for said property without the production of any bonds or the payment of any money; that a master’s certificate of sale was issued to said…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kneeland v. American Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. First Nat. Bank of Cincinnati v. FlershemSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Wahl v. SchmidtIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Oswianza v. Wengler & Mandell, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Chicago Title and Trust Co. v. RobinIllinois Supreme Court · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cowdery v. Northern Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1944
  2. De Korwin v. First Nat. Bank of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1949
  3. City National Bank & Trust Co. v. BairstowAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
  4. Nelson v. AmlingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
  5. Tudor v. FirebaughAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API