Legal Opinion

Washington Township v. Bonney

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1873PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Rush Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, C. J.

The appellees sued the appellant upon the following writing: “Washington Township, Rush Co., Ind., March 20th, 1865. This certifies that there is düe Messrs. Bonney & Berry, agents for educational interests in Indiana, from the treasury of Washington township, Rush *78county, Ind., the sum of seventy-two dollars, for nine sets of Payson, Denton, and Scribner’s series of writing tablets, to be delivered at the examiner’s office, payable when the funds come in with interest. John M. Tego,

“Township .Trustee.”

It is alleged in the complaint that before the commencement of this suit, in a reasonable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis Railroad v. CoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Heavenridge v. MondyIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Fankboner v. FankbonerIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Parker v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Jewett v. Honey Creek Draining Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Franklin Insurance v. WolffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. City of Plymouth v. MilnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Heavenridge v. MondyIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Cooper v. HayesIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ReedIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API