Legal Opinion
Heitner v. Government Employees Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Arthur D. Spatt, J.
By complaint dated March 5, 1982, pursuant to the provisions of CPLR 901 et seq. (class actions), plaintiff commenced the instant action. Plaintiff sues on his own behalf and on behalf of a purported class of persons similarly situated. He seeks relief against the named defendant insurance carriers in their individual capacity and in a capacity representative of a purported class of insurance carriers (foreign and/or domestic) authorized and licensed in New York to issue automobile accident insurance policies subject to section 670 et seq. of article 18…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Gurnee v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Normile v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Vinson v. BerkowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
3Cited by3 opinions
- Heitner v. Government Employees InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Heitner v. Government Employees InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Balanca v. GEICO General InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2006