Legal Opinion

Neurodiagnostics, Inc. v. Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 2008No. 2006-SC-000857-DGPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Justice MINTON.

At issue in this case is whether, under the Kentucky’s Motor Vehicle Reparations Act 1 (MVRA), a medical provider can have a direct right of action against an automobile insurer for basic reparation benefits (BRB) by assignment from the insured. We conclude, consistent with the lower courts that have addressed this issue, that under the old law, it could; but under the current law, it cannot. So we affirm.

This opinion involves two lawsuits filed by Neurodiagnostics, PSC, d/b/a Lexington Diagnostic Center (LDC), in district court. Both cases involved…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bob Hook Chevrolet Isuzu, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Transportation CabinetKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  2. United States v. Allstate Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  3. Aldridge v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  4. Kentucky Tax Commission v. SandmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  5. Richmond v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer DistrictCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Martis v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  2. Workforce Development Cabinet v. GainesKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Artrip v. NoeKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Pennyrile Allied Community Services, Inc. v. RogersKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Bell v. BellKentucky Supreme Court · 2014

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API