Legal Opinion · Dissent

Scott v. Briggs Way Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1996No. S-5842Published

1DissentMatthews, Justice

A motion for summary judgment should not be granted when genuine issues of material fact exist. Alaska R.Civ.P. 56(c). A trial court in addressing a motion for summary judgment, and an appellate court in reviewing a case in which a motion for summary judgment has been granted, should view the record in the light most favorable to the nonmovant. The court should also draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmov-ing party and against the movant. Hilde-brandt v. City of Fairbanks, 863 P.2d 240, 244 n. 6 (Alaska 1993); Lord v. Fogcutter Bar, 813 P.2d 660, 662 (Alaska 1991). Further, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McDermott International, Inc. v. WilanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Chandris, Inc. v. LatsisSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Desper v. Starved Rock Ferry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Antus v. Interocean S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
  5. Lord v. Fogcutter BarAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API