Red C. Oil Mfg. Co. v. Board of Agriculture
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern North Carolina
In Equity. In this cause, upon filing the bill, a temporary restraining order, enjoining the enforcement of the provisions of the statute in regard to inspection, but not as to the payment of the tax, was granted, with an order returnable on August 2, 1909, to defendants to show cause why an injunction should not be granted to the hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
CONNOR, District Judge.
Complainant Seeks to enjoin the enforcement of the provisions of an act of the General Assembly of North Carolina entitled “An act to provide for the inspection of illuminating oils and other fluids,” ratified March 8, 1909. Laws 1909, p. 911, c. 554. The act provides:
“Section 1. That all kerosene, or other illuminating oils, sold or offered for sale in this state, shall be subject to inspection and test to determine the safety and value for illuminating purposes.”
*697All manufacturers, wholesalers and jobbers before selling or offering for sale, in this state, any…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hawker v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Durham Provision Co. v. DavesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. Tennessee Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
- Benedicto v. Porto Rican American Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1919
- Armour & Co. v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Gulf Fisheries Co. v. DarrouzetDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.