Brandon v. Ard
Supreme Court of the United States
EEEOB TO THE SUPEEME COUET OP THE STATE OP KANSAS. The facts are stated in the opinion. ;The relations between the Government and Ard with respect to this land and Ard’s relation to and connection with the suit were' súch as to render the decree in the case of United States v. M., K. & T. Ry. Co. conclusive against Ard as to the equities- now claimed by him. Graham v. Great Water Power Co., 76 Pac. Rep. 811; Norton v. Evans, 82 Fed.
Read the full summary
EEEOB TO THE SUPEEME COUET OP THE STATE OP KANSAS. The facts are stated in the opinion. ;The relations between the Government and Ard with respect to this land and Ard’s relation to and connection with the suit were' súch as to render the decree in the case of United States v. M., K. & T. Ry. Co. conclusive against Ard as to the equities- now claimed by him. Graham v. Great Water Power Co., 76 Pac. Rep. 811; Norton v. Evans, 82 Fed. Rep. 804; Kerrison v. Stewart, 93 U. S. 155; Manson v. Duncanson, 166 U. Si 533; Freeman on Judgments (3d ed.), § 147; Black on Judgments § 85; Hornsly v.…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan
This case involves the title to a tract of land in Allen County, Kansas, containing eighty acres. It is described in the record as the northeast quarter of section 11, township 26, range 20, and will hereafter be alluded to as the tract in section 11. Adjoining that tract, in the same township, is another tract of eighty acres which will be hereafter referred to as the tract in section' 2: ' The present writ of error does not involve the title to the tract - in section 2, but it will conduce to a clear understanding of the questions raised as to the tract in section if we recall certain acts…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Shepley v. CowanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Pittsburg & Southern Coal Co. v. BatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Kansas Pacific Railroad v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- St. Paul & Sioux City Railroad v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Midwest Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Kelsey v. Lake Childs Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Tonopah & Goldfield Railroad v. FellanbaumNevada Supreme Court · 1910
- Sullivan v. DamonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1913
- Morrow v. Warner Valley Stock Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.