Legal Opinion

Scoccolo Construction, Inc. v. City of Renton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 2006No. 77459-5PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

11

Sanders, J.

RCW 4.24.360 invalidates as against public policy “no-damages-for-delay” clauses in construction contracts where the delay is caused by the contractee or “persons acting for” the contractee. Scoccolo Construction, Inc., sued the city of Renton (City) for damages stemming from delays in the completion of a street-widening project, including delays caused by utility companies operating under franchise agreements with the City.

¶2 The trial court awarded Scoccolo over $1,000,000 in damages and attorney fees. Both parties appealed to the Court of Appeals, which affirmed in part and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Prier v. Refrigeration Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Schmidt v. Cornerstone Investments, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Riss v. AngelWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Riss v. AngelWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. National Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. RivelandWashington Supreme Court · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Silverstreak, Inc. v. STATE DEPT. OF LABORWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Silverstreak, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Wright v. DAVE JOHNSON INS. INC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. Polygon Northwest Co. v. American National Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. Humphrey Industries, Ltd. v. Clay Street Associates, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2013

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API