Ricker v. Rombough
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
120 Cal.App.2d Supp. 912 (1953)
ANITA RICKER, Respondent,
v.
DONALD S. ROMBOUGH, Appellant.
California Court of Appeals.
Sept. 17, 1953.
Philip S. Ehrlich, Albert A. Axelrod and Irving Rovens for Appellant.
David K. Gilmore for Respondent.
HOYT, J.
This appeal involves the validity of a clause in a lease of real property providing for the acceleration of rent payments for default in payment of rent or violation by the tenant of any of the terms or conditions of the lease or in the event the premises are vacated by the tenant.
Respondent leased certain premises to appellant for a term of three years…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Better Food Markets, Inc. v. American District Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
- Dyer Bros. I. Wks. v. Central I. Wks.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Rice v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Ebbert v. Mercantile Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Graves v. CupicIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- King v. Petroleum Services CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Puritan Leasing Co. v. AugustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Aurora Business Park Associates, L.P. v. Michael Albert, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Vincent v. GraysonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.