San Patricio County v. McClane
Texas Supreme Court
Error from San Patricio. Tried below before the Hon. H. Olay Pleasants. This case will be found sufficiently stated in 44 Tex., 392. A statement of the evidence would not render more plain the opinion, or aid in understanding the conclusions announced in it.
1Opinion of the Court
Stayton, Associate Justice.
This cause was before this court at a former term and is reported in 44 Tex., 392.
IT pon that appeal it was decided that the contract, which ultimated in the warrants sued upon, was not illegal, and it becomes unnecessary to consider that question.
The cause was remanded for the reason that the warrants sued upon had not been presented to the treasurer of San Patricio county for registration under the 4th section of the act of 1870 (Pasch. Dig., 6044).
Upon the last trial there was evidence tending to show that the warrants had been presented to the treasurer of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- San Patricio County v. McClaneTexas Supreme Court · 1876
- Ashe v. County of HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lasater v. LopezTexas Supreme Court · 1919
- Adams v. McGillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Bridgers v. City of LampasasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Lasater v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Allen v. AbernethyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.