Legal Opinion

Collister v. Hayman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1902PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, William H. Collister, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Few York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Few York on the 3d day of March, 1902, denying the plaintiff’s motion for an injunction pendente lite.

1Opinion of the Court

Patterson, J.:

The plaintiff, describing himself as a broker or speculator in theatre tickets, sued the defendants as the proprietors and managers of the Knickerbocker Theatre in the city of Few York, to restrain them from interfering with him in the prosecution of his business of selling upon the sidewalk outside of prohibited limits, tickets of admission to that theatre. His complaint sets forth that he carries on business under a license granted to him by the municipal authorities of the city of Few York, and that hence he is lawfully *317engaged in the pursuit of his calling as authorized;…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Burnham v. . FlynnNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Bunke v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. Taylor v. CohnOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Woolcott v. ShubertNew York Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API