Legal Opinion · Dissent

Benilde-St. Margaret's High School v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 17, 1998No. C3-97-1779Published

1DissentShort, Judge

I respectfully dissent. The trial court erred in concluding Benilde’s tax liability is a “liability claim” resulting from the administration of Benilde’s employee benefits. Despite creative characterizations by counsel, Benilde’s claim is merely an effort to recover embezzled payroll taxes, and as such, falls outside the employee benefits program administration policy’s insuring agreement. First, Benilde’s loss is not an indemnity obligation owed to a third party as required by the policy, but is a claim against CFS. Thus, the funds do not constitute an amount for which Benilde is “legally…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bob Useldinger & Sons, Inc. v. HangslebenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. BriggsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  3. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. National Real Estate Clearinghouse, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API