Welch v. Neisius
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
The two principal issues are:
1. Did the court err in instructing the jury as to the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur?
2. Was the plaintiff negligent as a matter of law in the manner in which he attempted to enter the trailer?
In our earlier cases this court consistently held that three elements must be established to invoke the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur: (1) The accident must be the kind which ordinarily does not occur in the absence of someone’s negligence; (2) it must have been caused by an agency or instrumentality within the exclusive control of the defendant; and (3) it must not have been…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Turk v. H. C. Prange Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Ryan v. Zweck-Wollenberg Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Arledge v. SCHERER FREIGHT LINES, INC.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Colla v. MandellaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Peschel v. KlugWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Peplinski v. Fobe's Roofing, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Turtenwald v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. Ripon CooperativeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Freitag v. City of MontelloWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Tracy v. GrafColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.