Legal Opinion
King v. City of Long Beach
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 24, 1944No. Civ. 14486; Civ. 14487PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOX, J. pro tem.
The plaintiffs, Thomas E. King and Carl M. Hankins, filed separate actions for damages against the city of Long Beach. The cases were consolidated for trial, and also on appeal. These cases arose out of an accident which occurred in the city of Long Beach during the early morning of February 25, 1942, when an automobile owned and operated by plaintiff King, and in which plaintiff Hankins was riding, collided with an automobile owned and' driven by Engebret Larson, a police sergeant of said city. As a result of the accident both plaintiffs were injured and the police sergeant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Linde v. EmmickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Cate v. Fresno Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Rapolla v. GoulartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Hudgins v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Garns v. HalpernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Reynolds v. FilomeoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Davis v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Taylor v. RosiakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Larson v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.