United States v. Brandt
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
PRAY, District Judge.
The above entitled cause is before the court on the motions of plaintiff to strike the amended answer from the files, and for summary judgment against the defendants. The motions were argued orally by counsel for the respective parties, and twenty days were allowed for briefs, which were later filed, and the case thereafter submitted to the court for decision.
The proceeding for summary judgment was initiated following the failure of defendants to respond to the request of plaintiff under Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- West Kentucky Coal Co. v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
- Batson v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
- Bowers v. E. J. Rose Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- C. J. Wieland & Son Dairy Products Co. v. WickardDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1945
- In Re Independent Distillers of KentuckyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Timmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
- Freed v. Plastic Packaging Materials, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Robinson v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- In re MackDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970