Legal Opinion

United States v. Homer Lavel Rodgers

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 7, 1955No. 15007PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLRED, District Judge.

The sole question in this case is the sufficiency of the indictment to state an offense. The trial court sustained a motion to dismiss and the Government appeals. We hold the indictment is sufficient. It charges a violation of section 174, Title 21, U.S.C.A. and reads as follows:

“On or about April 5, 1953, in Bexar County, Texas, within said district and division, Homer Lavel Rodgers knowingly and fraudulently received and concealed a narcotic drug, to wit, eight and one-half (8%) grains of heroin, after being imported and brought into the United States; and the said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wong Lung Sing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  2. Aeby Et Ux. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  3. Shafer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. John Michael Williamson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. William L. Babb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  3. United States v. James Cromwell BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
  4. Jose Martinez Mendoza v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  5. Frank Doran Huizar v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API