Legal Opinion

City of Geary v. Moore

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 9, 1937No. 27239PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, C. J.

The city of Geary, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, instituted this 'action against Charles H. Moore, hereinafter referred to as defendant, wherein it was sought, under the power of eminent domain, to condemn certain property of the defendant for the purpose of erecting thereon a city jail. After the appraisement of the commissioners was filed, defendant filed a demand for a jury trial and a cross-petition wherein he sought to recover as actual damages the value of the land taken, and as consequential damages, the depreciated market value of the remainder caused by the erection of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Winchester v. RingIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Van DeVere v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  3. Oklahoma City v. EylarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. City of Tulsa v. HorwitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Oklahoma City v. VetterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stewart v. RoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. Wenderoth v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  3. City of McAlester v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  4. People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API