Legal Opinion
Porter v. Mid-Penn Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Porter)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 7, 1991No. 19-11637PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Bankruptcy Judge.
A. INTRODUCTION
The instant proceeding causes us to again visit an area of the law which we chronicled at length in In re Perkins, 106 B.R. 863, 866-70 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1989), aff'd, C.A. No. 89-8705 (E.D.Pa. Feb. 1, 1990): the practices of MID-PENN CONSUMER DISCOUNT CO. (“Consumer”) regarding retention of mortgages from a pri- or loan when making a new loan and a new mortgage recasting the prior loan transaction, and the disclosures required under the federal Truth-in-Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601, et seq. (“the TILA”) in doing so. In Perkins, we noted…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re Metro Transportation Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- In Re OwensUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Frascatore v. Secretary of Housing & Urban Development (In Re Frascatore)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- United States v. OwensDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Tucker v. Mid-Penn Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Tucker)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re PorterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Porter v. Mid-Penn Consumer Discount Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Wright v. Mid-Penn Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Wright)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Michel v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Michel)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Porter v. Mid-Penn Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Porter)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.