Legal Opinion

Russell v. Societe Anonyme Des Etablissements Aeroxon

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1935PublishedCited by 21 opinions

The Statute of Frauds of the State of New York does not apply to plaintiff’s contract. (Deutsch v. Textile Waste Mfg. Co., 212 App. Div. 681; Wilson v. Lewiston Mill Co., 150 N. Y. 314; Goldstein v. Scott, 76 App. Div. 78; Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. Lipowicz, 247 N. Y. 465; Union Nat. Bank v. Chapman, 169 N. Y. 538; Fish v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 211 N. Y. 374.) The contract is not invalid under the common law of the State of New York.

Read the full summary

The Statute of Frauds of the State of New York does not apply to plaintiff’s contract. (Deutsch v. Textile Waste Mfg. Co., 212 App. Div. 681; Wilson v. Lewiston Mill Co., 150 N. Y. 314; Goldstein v. Scott, 76 App. Div. 78; Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. Lipowicz, 247 N. Y. 465; Union Nat. Bank v. Chapman, 169 N. Y. 538; Fish v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 211 N. Y. 374.) The contract is not invalid under the common law of the State of New York. (Crane v. Powell, 139 N. Y. 379.) The written contracts are complete. (Sanders v. Pottlitzer Bros. Fruit Co., 144 N. Y. 209; Deutsch v. Textile Waste Mfg.…

1Opinion of the Court

Crane, Ch. J.

The Appellate Division reversing the Special Term has granted the motion of the defendant to dismiss the amended complaint upon the pleadings. An analysis of the complaint is necessary for the consideration of the question presented.

The plaintiff is an individual doing business as the Russell Sales Company. The Societe Anonyme des Etablissements Aeroxon is a foreign corporation organized and existing under the laws of Belgium. Friedrich Kaiser is an individual defendant whose residence or place of business is not stated.

The complaint alleges that on the 24th day of July, 1931,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harmon v. Alfred Peats Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Thatcher v. . MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  3. Reilly v. . SteinhartNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Seamans v. . BarentsenNew York Court of Appeals · 1905

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Intercontinental Planning, Ltd. v. Daystrom Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Kilberg v. Northeast Airlines, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Rubin v. Irving Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Recovery Consultants, Inc. v. Shih-HsiehAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. Gracie Square Realty Corp. v. Choice Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API