Legal Opinion

Moskowitz v. Bantrell

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided April 19, 1963No. 741962PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Southerland, Chief Justice:

This is a stockholder’s suit to compel the declaration of a dividend. It was heard by the Vice Chancellor upon the pleadings, the defendant corporation’s motion to dismiss, and affidavits. The Vice Chancellor properly treated the motion as in effect one for summary judgment. He dismissed the complaint on the merits. The stockholder appeals.

Filtrol is a major producer of petroleum cracking-catalysts used by petroleum refiners for the production of high-octane gasoline. It also produces other substances used for refining and drying purposes. Its capital structure…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Eshleman v. KeenanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1937
  3. Treves v. MenziesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1958
  4. Bryan v. AikinCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1912
  5. Treves v. MenziesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1958

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Sinclair Oil Corporation v. LevienSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971
  3. Kaplan v. Centex CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1971
  4. Warshaw v. CalhounSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
  5. Meyerson v. El Paso Natural Gas CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API