Merten v. National Manufacturers Bank of Neenah
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
We conclude that the judgment of divorce is reviewable by this court though one of the parties is dead, and that sufficient, though minimal, evidence was produced to sustain the judgment. The respondent contends that sec. 247.37 (2), Stats., denies the supreme court the power to set aside a divorce for lack of evidence when one of the parties has died.
Sec. 247.37 (2), Stats., provides in part:
“So far as said judgment affects the marital status of the parties the court has the power to vacate or modify the same for sufficient cause shown, upon its own motion, or upon the application of either…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gordon v. GordonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Roelke v. RoelkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Subrt v. SubrtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Rohloff v. RohloffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Swenson v. SwensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- M & I Bank v. First American National BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Spheeris v. SpheerisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Perrenoud v. PerrenoudWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Gauer v. GauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Heiting v. HeitingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.