Legal Opinion

Smith v. Mikki More, LLC

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 9, 2014No. 13 Civ. 3888(DLC)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

DENISE COTE, District Judge:

On February 7, 2014, defendant Vincent Pacifico (“Pacifico”) moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. For the reasons below, Pacifico’s motion is granted as to Count IV and otherwise denied.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Adam Smith (“Smith”), Frank D’Angelo (“D’Angelo”), and Dawn Jasper (“Jasper”) allege the following facts in *279their Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). Between May 31, 2011 and January 2012, plaintiffs created wholly original label designs (the “Label Materials”), packaging, advertisements, and a website (the “Website”) to promote…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Arista Records, LLC v. Doe 3Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  3. L-7 Designs, Inc. v. Old Navy, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  4. Mandarin Trading Ltd. v. WildensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Fink v. Time Warner CableCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. BWP Media USA Inc. v. Hollywood Fan Sites, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. Gotham Asset Locators Inc. v. State of IsraelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. John Gore Organization, Inc. v. Federal Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
  4. Mancilla v. ABM Industries, IncorporatedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  5. Mendelsohn v. Atria Builders, L.L.C.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API