Legal Opinion

Walter J. Schloss Associates v. Arkwin Industries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 29, 1982PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Mollen, P. J.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff was a minority stockholder of defendant Arkwin Industries, Inc. (Arkwin). Defendant Berlin, the founder, president and board chairman of Arkwin, was the majority stockholder, owning 85% of all issued and outstanding shares. In 1978 and 1979, Arkwin, a producer of material for use in the defense industry, realized increased sales and profits, and as of April 30, 1979, had a backlog of firm offers worth $35,000,000. At the same time, the corporation showed signs of increased profitability for the immediate future.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Breed v. BartonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Willcox v. SternNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Yoss v. SacksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,649 Jean Lorelle Burke v. Robert E. JacobyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  2. Fleming v. International Pizza Supply Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Walter J. Schloss Associates v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  4. Schloss v. Arkwin Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Collins v. Telcoa International Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API