Legal Opinion

Samp v. Long

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1926No. File No. 5563PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBurch, J.

This action is brought by plaintiff against defendants to recover damages for fraud and deceit in the sale of a farm, near Ipswich, S. D’. The case was tried to a jury, and resulted in a verdict of $2,500 damages on which judgment was rendered. A motion, in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial was denied by the trial court, and this, appeal is from the judgment and said- order.

P'rior to and at the time of the sale defendant Long was a married woman living with her husband at Omaha, Neb. She had for some time been engaged in the sale of real estate, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Adams v. CollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Edwards v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Van Abel v. WemmeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  4. First National Bank v. BlockerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. Batchelder v. StephensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stokes v. StokesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API