Legal Opinion

Geiler Co. v. Lindley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1981No. 80-1743PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Brown, J.

The primary issue raised in the appeal of this cause is whether appellant’s invoicing policy resulted in collection of state sales tax.

Appellant is a construction contractor and, as such, is within the purview of R. C. 5739.01(B).1 This section, when read in conjunction with R. C. 5741.02(B) renders appellant liable for taxes on materials used or consumed in Ohio. Upon installation by the construction contractor, no sales tax is due on these materials from its customers.

Appellant presents an argument, stating, in essence, that a construction contractor cannot be both a consumer and vendor…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Decor Carpet Mills, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Columbus v. Hotels.com, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. City of Findlay v. Hotels.Com, L.P.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
  3. City of Findlay v. Hotels.comDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API