Legal Opinion
Skelton v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 1, 1980No. 79 C 1243PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MORAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, purchasers of General Motors Corporation (GM) automobiles, seek relief under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty-Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act (Magnuson-Moss Act or Act), 15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq., because of the alleged undisclosed substitution of THM 200 (M29) trans missions for THM 350 (M38) transmissions in various 1976 through 1979 models of GM automobiles. Plaintiffs claim that the THM 200 transmission is inferior to the THM 350 and that the substitution has caused violations of written warranty, implied warranty and deceptive…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re General Motors Corporation Engine Interchange LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Denny v. Ford Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Colon Ex Rel. Molina v. Bic USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Feinstein v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- American Suzuki Motor Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Szajna v. General Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.