Legal Opinion
French v. Jones
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 29, 2000No. 2:98-cv-74520PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FOLLOWING REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. 1
TARNOW, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court following a remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. On March 25, 1999, the Court granted petitioner a writ of habeas corpus, on the basis that the state trial court gave the jury a supplemental instruction while petitioner’s counsel was absent. French v. Jones, 41 F.Supp.2d 726 (E.D.Mich.1999). In so ruling, the Court noted that the petitioner had established that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Rushen v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Oliver French, Jr. v. Kurt JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Oliver French, Jr. v. Kurt JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002