Legal Opinion
Flint v. Danbury & Bethel Street Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 5, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The receivership in this action is that over a street railway company, and is still in operation, and the appeal relates to claims arising before the appointment of a receiver and presents questions relating to allowed or disallowed preferences of such claims over the recorded liens of mortgagees. In Mersick v. Hartford & W. H. Horse R. Co., 76 Conn. 11, 55 Atl. 664, decided in 1903, we reviewed the law relating to this subject in railroad receivership cases as decided by the United States Supreme Court before that date, assuming but not deciding that they were applicable to a street railway.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gregg v. Metropolitan Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Cambria Iron Co. v. Union Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Old Colony Trust Co. v. Medfield & Medway Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Moore v. DonahooCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
- Mersick v. Hartford & West Hartford Horse RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
3Cited by4 opinions
- Snyder v. ReshenkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- In Re New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1967
- Marsh v. Arthur C. Marsh Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936
- McCook v. Groton & Stonington Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928