Legal Opinion

People v. Martin

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1989No. 86CA1364PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge NEY.

Defendant, Daniel J. Martin, appeals from the judgment of conviction entered on jury verdicts finding him guilty of first degree sexual assault, second degree burglary, aggravated robbery, a crime of violence, and of being a habitual offender. We affirm the judgment of conviction for sexual assault, burglary, robbery, and crime of violence but reverse the judgment of conviction on the habitual offender charge.

I

The defendant contends that the trial court erred in ordering him to display the scar on his abdomen to the jury. He argues that, inasmuch as there were photographs…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. WalkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  2. People v. ViduyaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. Lacy v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  4. People v. MannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  5. People v. BaileySupreme Court of Colorado · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. KaiamaHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. ConleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. RidenourColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. People v. AgadoColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. People v. AgadoColorado Court of Appeals · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API