Legal Opinion
Amoroso v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 11, 1992No. 2272 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
Alfred R. Amoroso appeals from an order entered by the Court of Common Pleas of Adams County denying an appeal from the suspension of his motor vehicle operating privilege by the Department of Transportation (DOT) as a consequence of Amoroso’s convictions for violating Section 13(a)(30) of The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act (Controlled Substance Act), Act of April 14, 1972, P.L. 233, as amended, 35 P.S. § 780-113(a)(30). Amoroso challenges the constitutionality of Section 13(m) of the Controlled Substance Act, 35 P.S. § 780-113(m), 1 arguing that it violates…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bureau of Traffic Safety v. LeaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. StrunkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. LiptakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. EmeryCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. RichardsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Orndoff v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Aten v. CMWLTH., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Wessel v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Ray v. Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Aten v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.