Legal Opinion

State v. Dunham

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 19, 1997No. C-960462PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the judgment entered upon the verdict of the jury finding the defendant-appellant, Gayle Craig Dunham, guilty of felonious assault as he stood charged in the single-count indictment upon which the prosecution was based. After a presentence investigation was completed, the court sentenced Dunham to a term of six to fifteen years’ imprisonment.

We are given this single assignment of error:

“Whether defendant-appellant, Gayle Craig Durham [sic], should have been convicted of felonious assault, as defined by Ohio Revised Code § 2903.11(A)(1), when it was a ‘mutual consent’…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. State v. CooeyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Smith v. John Deere Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Horton v. HornerOhio Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. JacintoOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. State v. MacKrillMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Grange Mutual Casualty Co. v. Chapman (In Re Chapman)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
  4. Hickman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. State v. McCurdyOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API