Legal Opinion

State v. Stinson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 8, 1964No. 50378PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, Commissioner.

A jury found the appellant Isaiah Stin-son guilty of robbery in the first degree and fixed his punishment at ten years’ imprisonment.

Upon the trial of the case Isaiah was represented by court appointed counsel and likewise upon this appeal court appointed counsel has briefed and orally argued his cause. A notice of appeal was not timely filed (V.A.M.S. § 547.070; Sup.Ct. Rules 28.03, 28.04, V.A.M.R.), but upon Isaiah’s application a special order was made (V.A.M.S. § 547.090, Sup.Ct.Rule 28.07) and he was permitted to file the notice out of time. In addition, since he…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  3. State v. ChurchillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  4. State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MurraySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. State v. RossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  3. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  4. State v. SykesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API