Legal Opinion

Dewolf v. Church

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 4, 1937No. 26263PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

Por convenience the Pittsburg Mortgage Investment Company will be referred to as mortgagee, the defendants in error as defendants, and the plaintiff in error as plaintiff.

It appears that on February 16, 1983, the defendants made, executed and delivered to the mortgagee their promissory note for $1,600 due and payable on November 1, 1932, with interest thereon at the fate of 6 per cent, per annum, payable annually (except the first payment) according to the tenor of ten interest coupons, the first of such coupons being for $64, and the remaining coupons being for $96 each, both interest and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bell v. Riggs Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Weyand v. . Park Terrace Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Chikowsky v. Central Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. First Nat. Bank of Iowa City, Iowa, v. WatsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Kelch v. BlevinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mortgage Bond Co. v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. East Basin Oil & Uranium Company v. PoundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  3. Citywide Banks v. ArmijoColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Burck v. HubbardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  5. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. RoseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API