Legal Opinion
American District Telegraph Co. v. Roberts & Son, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 24, 1929No. 6 Div. 160PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.
This case was tried Iby the court without a jury, and there was a judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals, and the assignments of error are predicated on two propositions only, first, that there was error in rendering a judgment for the plaintiff in any amount, and, second, if the plaintiff was entitled to recover at all, the amount! was limited by the contract to ISC'.
The main question and the one first presented in argument calls for an interpretation of the following clause in the contract, to wit:
“It is agreed by and between the parties hereto that the Contractor is not an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sun Printing and Publishing Assn. v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Keeble v. KeebleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. WestmorelandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Thompson v. Mobile Light & R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Industrial Tile, Inc. v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Foont-Freedenfeld Corp. v. Electro-Protective Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Schepps v. American District Telegraph Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Corral v. Rollins Protective Services Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
- Housing Authority of Birmingham Dist. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.