Legal Opinion

Studiengesellschaft Kohle, M.B.H. v. Dart Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided January 19, 1984No. 83-591PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from the interlocutory judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (Wright, J.), holding U.S. patent No. 3,113,115 to Ziegler et al. (Ziegler patent) valid, enforceable, and infringed by appellant Dart Industries, Inc.’s catalytic production of commercial grade polypropylene and ordering an accounting. 549 F.Supp. 716, 216 USPQ 381 (D.Del.1982). We affirm and remand for an accounting.

The technical facts concerning the claimed catalysts and Dart’s allegedly infringing process, as well as other matters essential to understanding…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Studiengesellschaft Kohle mbH v. Dart Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Polymer Technologies, Inc., and Walter Polovina v. Andrew P. Bridwell, H.A. Spec. Co., and Westmark Ag Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  3. Zenith Laboratories, Inc. v. Bristol-Myers Squibb CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  4. Scripps Clinic & Research Foundation v. Genentech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  5. In Re John A. DonohueCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API