Legal Opinion

Bruce Cooper v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 14, 1960No. 16525_1PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLEY, District Judge.

Appellant, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was indicted in the Southern District of California under the false statement statute, 18 U.S.C.A. § 1001. 1

The indictment charged that:

“On or about the 27th day of March, 1956, defendant Bruce Cooper did wilfully and knowingly make and cause to be made false and fraudulent statements and representations in a matter within the jurisdiction of a department and agency of the United States by stating to Leslie Jacobs and William Flynn, special agents of the Internal Revenue Service, that he had never received any income…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. United States v. DebrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Wolfle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Blau v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Remmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Richard E. Loux and Neil Conrad Wallen v. United States of America, Vertis James Barrett, Arthur St. Peter Andharold Oscar Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  2. Meyer Harris Cohen, AKA Michael 'Mickey' Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  3. Henry Rodella v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  4. United States v. Darrell Daniel Goldfine, United States of America v. Solomon Walter GoldfineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  5. Loyd Carl Ray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API