H. B. Cummings v. New England Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered for the insurance company notwithstanding the jury’s verdict in favor of the assured Cummings. The jury’s verdict was set aside by the trial court because he found, as a matter of law, that the policy was suspended at the time of the fire because of an increase in hazard not agreed to by the company. 1
The appellee insurance company supports the action of the trial court on the ground stated, but also contends that it should have prevailed on other grounds as well. Principal among these is its contention that no insurance had ever…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Scottish Union & National Insurance v. Warren Gee Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1918
- Rivara v. Queen's InsuranceMississippi Supreme Court · 1885
- Goldman v. Piedmont Fire Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Camden Fire Ins. Ass'n. v. KochMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
- Crane Co. v. Aeroquip CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mississippi Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. ToddMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
- Apparel Manufacturers' Supply Co. v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Canal Ins. Co. v. Bush & KingMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
- Maryland Casualty Company v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Cosmopolitan Insurance v. Capitol Trailer & Body, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.