Legal Opinion

People v. Manigault

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 23, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his contention that the trial court’s examination of witnesses during the trial, and comments during the prosecutor’s summation, denied him a fair trial (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Charleston, 56 NY2d 886; People v Gonzalez, 183 AD2d 783). In any event, the trial court’s questioning was proper (cf. People v Yut Wai Tom, 53 NY2d 44, 45).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Schmidt, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. Yut Wai TomNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. CharlestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. TownsendAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. People v. ManigaultAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003