Legal Opinion

Stueber v. Admiral Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 12, 1950No. 10057PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, ¡Circuit Judge.

Defendant appeals from the judgments entered against it in the District Court on the second trial of this ¡consolidated action for malicious prosecution, assigning as error (1) denial of its motions for directed verdicts, made at the close of plaintiffs’ case and again at the ¡close of all the evidence, (2) admission of certain evidence offered by plaintiffs and exclusion of other evidence offered by defendant, (3) giving certain instructions requested by plaintiffs and refusal to give other instructions requested by defendant, and (4) refusal to set aside as excessive…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Harpham v. WhitneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. RossiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  3. Jacks v. StimpsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1852
  4. Stueber v. Admiral Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  5. ætna Life Ins. Co. v. WhartonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Richard Odorizzi v. A. O. Smith Corporation and Pinkerton's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  2. Seelig v. Harvard Cooperative SocietyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973
  3. Andersen v. SchulmanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1971
  4. Fred W. Brandt v. The Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
  5. Fred W. Brandt v. The Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API